Try the tool for free

Try it
Domain 6 · Socioeconomic & Environmental

6.6Environmental harm

The development and operation of AI systems causing environmental harm, such as through energy consumption of data centers, or material and carbon footprints associated with AI hardware.

Applicable legal frameworks

Québec

Principe 9 (durabilité)

Ethical declaration based on 10 principles (well-being, respect for autonomy, privacy protection, etc.). A recognized Quebec reference.

International

ISO/IEC 42001:2023Recommandation

A.10 (impacts)

Certifiable standard describing the requirements for establishing an AI management system. Relevant for voluntary certification processes.

Quebec sector examples

Centres de données

Centres de donnéesOpérateur de centre de données

Un projet d'expansion de centre de données IA au Québec accroît la pression sur le réseau hydroélectrique et sur la consommation d'eau pour le refroidissement.

Recommended mitigations

  • 1.6Environmental Impact Management

    Processes for measuring, reporting, and reducing the environmental footprint of AI systems to ensure sustainability and responsible resource use.

  • 1.7Societal Impact Assessment

    Processes that assess the effects of AI systems on society, including impacts on employment, power dynamics, political processes, and cultural values.

  • 3.2Data Governance

    Policies and procedures that frame the responsible acquisition, curation, and use of data to ensure compliance, quality, user privacy, and removal of harmful content.

  • 4.2Risk Disclosure

    Formal reporting protocols and notification systems that communicate information on risks, mitigation plans, safety assessments, and significant AI-related activities to enable external oversight and inform stakeholders.

  • 4.4Governance Disclosure

    Formal disclosure mechanisms that communicate governance structures, decision-making frameworks, and safety commitments to increase transparency and enable external oversight of high-stakes AI decisions.

Documented risks (57)

Entries from the AI Risk Repository (MIT) classified under this subdomain. Original content in English.

Entity
Intent
Timing

57 entries

Risk CategoryCunha2023

03.06.00Environmental and socioeconomic harms

"At a time of increasing climate urgency, energy consumption and the carbon footprint of AI applications are also matters of ethics and responsibility [68]. As with other energy-intensive technologies like proof-of-work blockchain, the call is to research more environmentally sustainable algorithms to offset the increasing use scale."

AIIntentionalPost-deployment
Risk CategoryHagendorff2024

05.15.00Sustainability

Generative models are known for their substantial energy requirements, necessitating significant amounts of electricity, cooling water, and hardware containing rare metals. The extraction and utilization of these resources frequently occur in unsustainable ways. Consequently, papers highlight the urgency of mitigating environmental costs for instance by adopting renewable energy sources and utilizing energy-efficient hardware in the operation and training of generative AI systems.

AIIntentionalOther
Risk CategoryPaes2023

10.09.00Environmental Impacts

"The production process of these devices requires raw materials such as nickel, cobalt, and lithium in such high quantities that the Earth may soon no longer be able to sustain them in sufficient quantities."

HumanIntentionalPost-deployment
Risk Sub-CategoryShelby2023

11.05.05Environmental harms

depletion or contamination of natural resources, and damage to built environments... that may occur throughout the lifecycle of digital technologies [170, 237] from “crale (mining) to usage (consumption) to grave (waste)”

AIIntentionalPost-deployment
Risk Sub-CategorySolaiman2023

13.01.06Environmental Costs

"The computing power used in training, testing, and deploying generative AI systems, especially large scale systems, uses substantial energy resources and thereby contributes to the global climate crisis by emitting greenhouse gasses."

HumanIntentionalOther
Risk Sub-CategorySolaiman2023

13.02.05Ecosystem and Environment

"Impacts at a high-level, from the AI ecosystem to the Earth itself, are necessarily broad but can be broken down into components for evaluation."

HumanIntentionalPost-deployment
Risk Sub-CategoryTan2022

15.02.05Environmental

The risk of harm to the natural environment posed by the ML system.

AIIntentionalOther
Risk Sub-CategoryWeidinger2022

16.06.01Environmental harms from operating LMs

"LMs (and AI more broadly) can have an environmental impact at different levels, including: (1) direct impacts from the energy used to train or operate the LM, (2) secondary impacts due to emissions from LM-based applications, (3) system-level impacts as LM-based applications influence human behaviour (e.g. increasing environmental awareness or consumption), and (4) resource impacts on precious metals and other materials required to build hardware on which the computations are run e.g. data centres, chips, or devices. Some evidence exists on (1), but (2) and (3) will likely be more significant for overall CO2 emissions, and harder to measure [96]. (4) may become more significant if LM-based applications lead to more computations being run on mobile devices, increasing overall demand, and is modulated by life-cycles of hardware."

AIIntentionalOther
Risk Sub-CategoryWeidinger2021

17.06.01Environmental harms from operation LMs

"Large-scale machine learning models, including LMs, have the potential to create significant environmental costs via their energy demands, the associated carbon emissions for training and operating the models, and the demand for fresh water to cool the data centres where computations are run (Mytton, 2021; Patterson et al., 2021)."

AIIntentionalOther
Risk Sub-CategoryWeidinger2023

18.06.02Environmental damage

"Creating negative environmental impacts though model development and deployment"

AIIntentionalOther
Risk CategoryEPIC2023

31.06.00Exacerbating Climate Change

"the growing field of generative AI, which brings with it direct and severe impacts on our climate: generative AI comes with a high carbon footprint and similarly high resource price tag, which largely flies under the radar of public AI discourse. Training and running generative AI tools requires companies to use extreme amounts of energy and physical resources. Training one natural language processing model with normal tuning and experiments emits, on average, the same amount of carbon that seven people do over an entire year.121'

AIIntentionalOther
Risk CategoryStahl2024

32.04.00Environmental impacts

Environmental harm, Sustainability

AIOtherOther
Risk CategorySaghiri2022

39.02.00Energy Consumption

Some learning algorithms, including deep learning, utilize iterative learning processes [23]. This approach results in high energy consumption.

AIIntentionalPre-deployment
Risk CategoryAllianz2018

41.06.00Environment

"AI is already helping to combat the impact of climate change with smart technology and sensors reducing emissions. However, it is also a key component in the development of nanobots, which could have dangerous environmental impacts by invisibly modifying substances at nanoscale."

AIIntentionalPost-deployment
Risk Sub-CategoryAllianz2018

41.06.01Accelerated development of nanotechnology produces uncontrolled production of toxic nanoparticles

"AI is a key component for the development of nanobots, which could have dangerous environmental implications by invisibly modifying substances at nanoscale. For example, nanobots could start chemical reactions that would create invisible nanoparticles that are toxic and potentially lethal."

AIIntentionalPost-deployment
Risk CategoryCoghlan2023

44.01.00Intentional: socially condemned/illegal

"Many intentional harms, including confinement, husbandry procedures like tail-docking, and slaughter, are legal or socially accepted, while others such as wildlife trafficking and violence against companion animals are generally socially condemned and often illegal. AI can be designed or adopted by humans who harm animals to pursue their goals more effectively. We therefore distinguish AI-facilitated intentional harms that are currently socially accepted and generally legal, from uses and abuses of AI that cause harms that are not socially accepted and are often illegal."

HumanIntentionalPost-deployment
Risk Sub-CategoryCoghlan2023

44.01.01AI intentionally designed and used to harm animals in ways that contradict social values or are illegal

HumanIntentionalPost-deployment
Risk Sub-CategoryCoghlan2023

44.01.02AI designed to benefit animals, humans, or ecosystems is intentionally abused to harm animals in ways that contradict social values or are illegal

HumanIntentionalPost-deployment
Risk CategoryCoghlan2023

44.02.00Intentional: socially accepted/legal

"AI designed to impact animals in harmful ways that reflect and amplify existing social values or are legal"

HumanIntentionalPost-deployment
Risk CategoryCoghlan2023

44.03.00Unintentional: direct

"AI designed to benefit animals, humans, or ecosystems has unintended harmful impact on animals"

OtherIntentionalOther

Evaluate this risk for your use case

Our risk evaluation wizard is coming soon.

Ce site utilise des cookies essentiels et fonctionnels pour améliorer votre expérience. Politique de confidentialité